Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.8% regression in v8.browsing_desktop_turbo at 445288:445290 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988912255094546784
,
Feb 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop_turbo Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg Revision Result N chromium@445287 89048763 +- 6484182 20 good chromium@445290 88207373 +- 9367970 19 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_desktop_turbo Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988912255094546784 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6347042558836736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10
Downgrading P2s that haven't been modified in more than 6 months, which have no component or owner. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Jan 31 2017