New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 687345 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Untriaged
Owner: ----
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: 2019-07-09
OS: ----
Pri: 3
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6.8% regression in v8.browsing_desktop_turbo at 445288:445290

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Jan 31 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, Jan 31 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=687345

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgsLTdjwkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop_turbo
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@445287      89048763 +- 6484182      20      good
chromium@445290      88207373 +- 9367970      19      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_desktop_turbo

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988912255094546784

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6347042558836736


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Labels: Pri-3
NextAction: 2019-07-09
Downgrading P2s that haven't been modified in more than 6 months, which have no component or owner.

Sign in to add a comment