New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 687201 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 446258:446284

Project Member Reported by pmeenan@chromium.org, Jan 31 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=687201

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgiICvpgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus6
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 31 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@446257      45843946 +- 1213784      21      good
chromium@446284      45657871 +- 970906       21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.en.m.wikipedia.org.wiki.Science memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8988937177436845072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5577554070601728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@446257      52425150 +- 2526079      21      good
chromium@446284      52379265 +- 2792492      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987399401674707072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6107923710738432


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Labels: Performance-Memory
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment