New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 687120 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Mar 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

V8 correctness failure in configs: x64,fullcode:x64,ignition_staging

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Jan 31 2017

Issue description

Cc: bmeu...@chromium.org jarin@chromium.org
Labels: -Pri-1 Pri-2
Status: Available (was: Untriaged)
// PTAL. Repros with fullcode/default. Simple repro:

function foo(e) {
    print(Math.clz32(-undefined));
}
foo();
%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(foo);
foo();

// Output:
# Compared x64,fullcode with x64,default
#
# Flags of x64,fullcode:
--abort_on_stack_overflow --expose-gc --allow-natives-syntax --invoke-weak-callbacks --omit-quit --es-staging --random-seed 1234 --nocrankshaft --turbo-filter=~ --validate-asm
# Flags of x64,default:
--abort_on_stack_overflow --expose-gc --allow-natives-syntax --invoke-weak-callbacks --omit-quit --es-staging --random-seed 1234 --validate-asm
#
# Difference:
- 32
+ NaN
#
# Source file:
none
#
### Start of configuration x64,fullcode:
32
32

### End of configuration x64,fullcode
#
### Start of configuration x64,default:
32
NaN

### End of configuration x64,default

Project Member

Comment 2 by ClusterFuzz, Mar 8 2017

ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 43662:43663.

Detailed report: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/testcase?key=6035186614796288

Fuzzer: foozzie_js_mutation
Job Type: foozzie_ignition_staging
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: V8 correctness failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  configs: x64,fullcode:x64,ignition_staging
  sources: 52c
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: V8: 42370:42371
Fixed: V8: 43662:43663

Reproducer Testcase: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/download/AMIfv95w4sFDAgzay9UPmiJumzSfHaj4JACybdy_gGAnJ6QhEknmntrfpdVfe3j1wtoL4J9Ou56PYXycY9ixDn-0IO3CPReT4xJPAbIkCFIEmvQCgFhPXaDoiFPHe1Enm_i4wi_R1-5mwV3lRdL4OWm4zbW7jMJqS9FJx4fvJ_8vBF_Jim3qfIlEyfCQYAk5JcF0Kg0cvJfXuDax9f1a7rqrDUlESSIjZVwqQ7XQslPxJsQIr-slJBawc5w6r8rIQ2tLVFw9H30ZVRsPNLL9o9QUxUqYpkbezxGHbMNPXxvGiYaunzIi7F7mK0VoyX9azgS_4UkKAkaD13LKwP7xhBHUL5OkTjtezA9GQG-FVQtVwM7xxyuBF0w?testcase_id=6035186614796288


See https://dev.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/bugs/reproducing-clusterfuzz-bugs for more information.

If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
Project Member

Comment 3 by ClusterFuzz, Mar 8 2017

Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified
Status: Verified (was: Available)
ClusterFuzz testcase 6035186614796288 is verified as fixed, so closing issue.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.
Labels: ClusterFuzz-Wrong
Status: Available (was: Verified)
Labels: v8-foozzie-legacy
Status: WontFix (was: Available)
Labels: -ClusterFuzz-Wrong
We have made a bunch of changes on ClusterFuzz side, so resetting ClusterFuzz-Wrong label.

Sign in to add a comment