New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 687033 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Last visit 16 days ago
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

43.1% regression in webrtc_perf_tests at 16324:16324

Project Member Reported by peah@chromium.org, Jan 31 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by peah@chromium.org, Jan 31 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=687033

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg8N_nowoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

webrtc-linux-large-tests

Comment 2 by peah@chromium.org, Jan 31 2017

Owner: brandtr@chromium.org
brandtr@: This regression seems related to flexfec. Do you know what CL could have caused it?
Cc: brandtr@chromium.org
Owner: hta@chromium.org
This seems to be a H264 on Linux regression, not related to FlexFEC. See the graphs here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=79538484f6034b498822bd148ec88e50afe34e433a93ea04695e5df79f888646. The decode_time changes for all H264 tests at around the same revision, but only on Linux.

The alert is on a Chromium roll, which includes this CL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2651183003. "Reland of Add assembly for x86 to OpenH264 encoder".

(Do the mac/win bots use HW encoders, and therefore we don't see the regression there?)

hta@: Would you mind taking a look at this alert? Is the regression expected?

Comment 4 by ivoc@chromium.org, Feb 23 2017

I added several improvements to this bug that triggered on the same revision.

Comment 5 by hta@chromium.org, Apr 5 2017

Owner: magjed@chromium.org
OpenH264 is only used for encoding, not decoding, so this test (which looks to be decode-only) should not have been affected.

Needs to be looked at by someone who understands the test; it's possible that OpenH264 with assembly produces files that are slower to decode than what's produced w/o assembly, but that would be bizarre.
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

Sign in to add a comment