Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
38.7% regression in webrtc_perf_tests at 16272:16272 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 30 2017
brandtr@: This regression seems to possibly be related to your CL https://codereview.webrtc.org/2646343005. Could you please take a look?
,
Jan 30 2017
I don't think it's related, as that CL only reorders some member function declarations/definitions. Are the alerts only on the Android bots? My experience is that their numbers can be quite noisy. Maybe the two "modes" in the rampdown test can be explained by two different devices running the same test? holmer: You are more familiar with the RampUp tests. Any idea if this alert is reason for concern?
,
Jan 30 2017
It seems to be a lot worse, but your explanation could be correct. If it's only visible on this device I guess we could ignore it, it does look like it happened every now and then before too. I didn't see any other suspicious webrtc change in the nearby datapoints either...
,
Jan 31 2017
I think it looks too stable to be explained by noise but I have not seen any other such regressions. Would you consider the amount of increase as being so high that we should be concerned with it?
,
Mar 6 2017
Removing R-V-G label (was set upon bug filing because the bot was incorrectly configured as internal)
,
Mar 6 2017
holmer@: Would you consider the amount of increase as being so high that we should be concerned with it?
,
Mar 6 2017
I think we can ignore it. Probably caused by some change in timing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by peah@chromium.org
, Jan 30 2017