New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 686175 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

48.2%-59.8% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 445701:445756

Project Member Reported by pras...@chromium.org, Jan 27 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 27 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.canvas
  Metric       : upload-video-to-texture/upload-video-to-texture

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@445700      1031.1 +- 189.537      21      good
chromium@445756      1017.7 +- 84.8934      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989285765430360672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6462755906781184


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Looks like a patch was landed and reverted several times.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.canvas
  Metric       : draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d/draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@445700      1649.18 +- 874.876      21      good
chromium@445756      1616.61 +- 1078.45      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987397530255278688

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5049056969097216


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.canvas
  Metric       : draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d/draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@445700      836.56 +- 767.742       21      good
chromium@445756      833.108 +- 479.742      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982652086066669312

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5049056969097216


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment