New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 686075 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Windows
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

chrome uses too much ram

Reported by a58976...@gmail.com, Jan 27 2017

Issue description

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0.14393; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/57.0.2950.4 Safari/537.36 OPR/44.0.2475.0 (Edition developer)

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. I just turned on chrome

What is the expected behavior?

What went wrong?
As you can see, chrome canary consumes about 10 times more ram than opera developer which uses chromium. It uses so much ram that it often causes blue-screen. Even if I reinstalled chrome, it has same problem. Chrome stable has the ram leakage problem,too.

Did this work before? Yes 57.0.2950.4 

Chrome version: 58.0.2994.0  Channel: canary
OS Version: 10.0
Flash Version:
 
ScreenShot_20170127225858.png
663 KB View Download
Labels: Needs-Bisect Needs-Triage-M58

Comment 2 by hdodda@chromium.org, Jan 30 2017

Cc: hdodda@chromium.org
Labels: Needs-Feedback
Tested on windows 7 using chrome canary M58 #58.0.2966.0 and chrome version M57 #57.0.2950.4 and didn't observe any high cpu usage in chrome.

Attached screenshots for reference.

@a58976664-- As per the attached screenshot , ram usage of opera seems to be more than the chrome ram usage , Could you please confirm us what is the exact issue.

Thanks!
686075_chrome.PNG
137 KB View Download
686075_canary.PNG
252 KB View Download
Friendly ping!!
a58976664@,
Could you please respond on comment#2 & update the thread.
Thank you.
Cc: kkaluri@chromium.org
a58976664@,
Could you please respond on comment#2 & update the thread.
Thank you.
Status: WontFix (was: Unconfirmed)
Closing since there is no response from the reporter.
Project Member

Comment 6 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, Jan 4

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/6f8fb3d2f0f570871e00c9b1ec73caf58401f5df

commit 6f8fb3d2f0f570871e00c9b1ec73caf58401f5df
Author: Lin Sun <lin.sun@intel.com>
Date: Fri Jan 04 04:06:29 2019

Cleaning up WebGL conformance expectations for Linux Intel

Remove intel flag from faiure expectations for fixed cases.
Comment fixed mesa version for Linux driver bugs.

Bug:  483282 , 905006,  686075 , 666384, 905011
Bug:  680276 ,  867675 
Change-Id: Ib54f28397bdd073778bea7294870516bb19d1ce6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1390765
Commit-Queue: Lin Sun <lin.sun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Russell <kbr@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#619880}
[modify] https://crrev.com/6f8fb3d2f0f570871e00c9b1ec73caf58401f5df/content/test/gpu/gpu_tests/webgl2_conformance_expectations.py
[modify] https://crrev.com/6f8fb3d2f0f570871e00c9b1ec73caf58401f5df/content/test/gpu/gpu_tests/webgl_conformance_expectations.py

Sign in to add a comment