Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.9% regression in webrtc.peerconnection at 443553:443595 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989574113900088752
,
Jan 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989574103851099344
,
Jan 24 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author mtklein@chromium.org === Hi mtklein@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Mike Klein Commit : e71b167dbd4d8da76495ca85db83d1a3b49aaabd Date : Fri Jan 13 13:25:28 2017 Subject: Attempt 3: SkRasterPipelineBlitter: support A8 Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : webrtc.peerconnection Metric : cpu_utilization/cpu_utilization_browser Change : 21.37% | 15.8078682151 -> 19.1861713851 Revision Result N chromium@443552 15.8079 +- 1.89059 6 good chromium@443563 16.396 +- 0.625887 6 good chromium@443564 16.3192 +- 1.1245 6 good chromium@443564,skia@e71b167dbd 18.7519 +- 1.00314 6 bad <-- chromium@443564,skia@7adde145d3 19.2802 +- 1.20617 6 bad chromium@443565 19.2486 +- 1.31168 6 bad chromium@443566 19.3283 +- 0.613272 6 bad chromium@443569 19.2896 +- 0.833095 6 bad chromium@443574 19.2303 +- 1.26169 6 bad chromium@443595 19.1862 +- 1.305 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.peerconnection Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989574113900088752 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5230101567897600 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Mike Klein Commit : e71b167dbd4d8da76495ca85db83d1a3b49aaabd Date : Fri Jan 13 13:25:28 2017 Subject: Attempt 3: SkRasterPipelineBlitter: support A8 Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : webrtc.peerconnection Metric : cpu_utilization/cpu_utilization_browser Change : 22.61% | 15.5784932646 -> 19.1003744788 Revision Result N chromium@443552 15.5785 +- 0.903313 6 good chromium@443563 16.4325 +- 1.85688 6 good chromium@443564 16.1009 +- 1.30445 6 good chromium@443564,skia@e71b167dbd 19.2138 +- 0.403078 6 bad <-- chromium@443564,skia@7adde145d3 19.2033 +- 0.895027 6 bad chromium@443565 19.1912 +- 0.864368 6 bad chromium@443566 19.0976 +- 1.43029 6 bad chromium@443569 19.0803 +- 1.5202 6 bad chromium@443574 18.9004 +- 1.00885 6 bad chromium@443595 19.1004 +- 0.73831 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.peerconnection Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989574103851099344 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5331088865492992 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 24 2017
Any performance regression from that CL is intentional in exchange for quality. Does this benchmark really measure graphics performance? Benchmark : webrtc.peerconnection Metric : cpu_utilization/cpu_utilization_browser
,
Jan 24 2017
I'd say so. It launches a loopback call in 720p, and displays both the video from the camera, and the video received from the peerconnection. The page loaded is this one: https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/peerconnection/constraints/ |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ehmaldonado@chromium.org
, Jan 24 2017