Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.5% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 444722:444804 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989590649489580928
,
Jan 24 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author etienneb@chromium.org === Hi etienneb@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : etienneb Commit : c9e8aae171ee0999ed1ad766089d76cf40159fee Date : Thu Jan 19 16:34:51 2017 Subject: Fix ASAN default suppression symbol mangling on windows Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : set-attribute/set-attribute Change : 0.86% | 808.455672556 -> 815.425744309 Revision Result N chromium@444721 808.456 +- 20.6759 9 good chromium@444763 794.398 +- 5.51726 6 good chromium@444764 822.866 +- 9.60488 6 bad <-- chromium@444765 818.73 +- 4.65103 6 bad chromium@444766 804.802 +- 6.04016 6 bad chromium@444769 803.534 +- 5.92349 6 bad chromium@444774 807.796 +- 8.76986 6 bad chromium@444784 815.142 +- 3.97616 6 bad chromium@444804 815.426 +- 5.62538 8 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989590649489580928 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4917987502456832 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 24 2017
This regression CAN'T be related this patch. see: https://codereview.chromium.org/2631753002/ My change has no functional change.
,
Jan 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989569783834637216
,
Jan 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : yosin Commit : f34f5cb8f4f2f4a54afe4094dc7933193220116e Date : Fri Jan 20 07:16:51 2017 Subject: Introduce SynchronousMutationObserver::didChangeAttribute() Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : set-attribute/set-attribute Change : 10.24% | 777.582305549 -> 697.986804822 Revision Result N chromium@444721 777.582 +- 180.406 9 good chromium@444886 791.981 +- 21.5635 6 good chromium@444969 794.651 +- 16.1267 6 good chromium@444990 803.899 +- 15.0979 6 good chromium@445000 798.959 +- 6.89666 6 good chromium@445005 794.264 +- 7.19725 6 good chromium@445006 720.162 +- 6.69607 6 bad <-- chromium@445007 732.507 +- 2.21684 5 bad chromium@445008 716.383 +- 17.573 5 bad chromium@445010 721.492 +- 10.4602 6 bad chromium@445051 697.987 +- 22.0547 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989569783834637216 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6366777279250432 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Jan 24 2017