Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
242.1%-2378.9% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 at 444303:444371 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989593889362990304
,
Jan 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max Revision Result N chromium@444328 93.0514 +- 163.719 21 good chromium@444371 103.288 +- 110.841 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989593889362990304 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5882158939373568 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Jan 24 2017