Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.8%-18.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 444018:444104 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989915620595956448
,
Jan 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Change : 10.79% | 21189115.4286 -> 23475275.5556 Suspected Commit Range 2 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/b20f0039e91883b8f001390a2f21616b4ec5752d..91a065822077d6e8b89e39d0487896deccaf1bb9 Revision Result N chromium@444017 21189115 +- 6430079 14 good chromium@444044 21386510 +- 8298463 14 good chromium@444050 21098649 +- 6587926 14 good chromium@444051 --- --- build failure chromium@444052 23826367 +- 4744977 6 bad chromium@444053 23859508 +- 6625412 9 bad chromium@444054 24066133 +- 8016524 14 bad chromium@444057 23758819 +- 8365712 14 bad chromium@444070 23475276 +- 7164813 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989915620595956448 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6434941497245696 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 26 2017
All related the revert in Issue 671156 #c52, the regression was expected.
,
Mar 14 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org
, Jan 20 2017