Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.5% regression in speedometer-ignition at 443147:443210 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionProbably reverting strongly rooted literals, but bisecting.
,
Jan 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990110231420535088
,
Jan 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : speedometer-ignition Metric : Total/Total Change : 0.84% | 49340.7492857 -> 49556.2313095 Suspected Commit Range 5 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/80aedca1fd5f6a735391ee96f7dbe24220d05782..3988b62ce2aa6071455afd06e06b94af7a044dd9 Revision Result N chromium@443146 49340.7 +- 667.064 14 good chromium@443178 49333.4 +- 1044.67 21 good chromium@443194 49256.6 +- 1076.7 21 good chromium@443195 --- --- build failure chromium@443196 --- --- build failure chromium@443197 --- --- build failure chromium@443198 --- --- build failure chromium@443199 49510.3 +- 908.485 14 bad chromium@443210 49556.2 +- 691.107 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests speedometer-ignition Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990110231420535088 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6377184823869440 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 19 2017
I'm seeing a regression on speedometer-ignition on nexus 5 after, where it seems https://codereview.chromium.org/2566043004 could be a cause. Could you take a look please?
,
Jan 19 2017
I don't see how my CL could have an impact on this test. It just adds some UMA at page load. There doesn't seem to be a regression on non-ignition bots.
,
Jan 30 2017
Taking another look at the bisect results, the variance seems too high to call this your CL. The graphs seem to recover (at least, up to the next regression), so marking wontfix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by leszeks@chromium.org
, Jan 18 2017