Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
24.7% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 443535:443553 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990282530292684192
,
Jan 16 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author benwells@chromium.org === Hi benwells@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : benwells Commit : b3c6a28850a816162c59526005665c683ca42308 Date : Fri Jan 13 14:13:45 2017 Subject: Show the search geolocation disclosure from geolocation API use. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : mean_input_event_latency/https___www.google.com__hl_en_q_barack+obama Change : 20.32% | 7.60983333333 -> 9.15583333333 Revision Result N chromium@443534 7.60983 +- 0.483525 6 good chromium@443544 7.51967 +- 0.471446 6 good chromium@443549 7.682 +- 0.771343 6 good chromium@443551 7.62167 +- 0.419535 6 good chromium@443552 7.84267 +- 0.483029 6 good chromium@443553 9.15583 +- 0.903205 6 bad <-- To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com..hl.en.q.barack.obama smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990282530292684192 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5255279773483008 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 31 2017
OK, I think I have an idea about this.
,
Feb 1 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/c7b66b0e4837e533f8ec3edf9125144e5e3430bd commit c7b66b0e4837e533f8ec3edf9125144e5e3430bd Author: benwells <benwells@chromium.org> Date: Wed Feb 01 22:51:22 2017 Improve performance of search geolocation disclosure check. This check is run for all navigations, but the disclosure is only shown in a small number of cases. This change reorders the checks to do the more expensive Android permission check later in the process. BUG= 681663 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2661303003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#447628} [modify] https://crrev.com/c7b66b0e4837e533f8ec3edf9125144e5e3430bd/chrome/browser/android/search_geolocation/search_geolocation_disclosure_tab_helper.cc
,
Feb 10 2017
Turns out my fix didn't fix the regression, and upon looking at the code change I believe the regression is because running this benchmark now causes an infobar to be shown, whereas it didn't before. I'd like to verify that the infobar is the cause of the perf regression, but I'm having trouble running the benchmark locally. The results seem very noisy. I'll try again next week but am not really confident about it.
,
Feb 10 2017
This alert is only on some android devices. Ned, is there currently a way to record a video (if we send a job to the trybots)? It seems like we wouldn't want the infobar showing during the performance test, unless it's indicative of normal user experience (i.e. 95% of page loads show this infobar). Is there any way to turn it off?
,
Feb 10 2017
You can add "--profiler=android-screen-recorder" command line when run the job in trybot to get the video (look for the log that say uploading it to cloud storage in the bot log). Though I am not sure whether looking at the video is the most useful thing for you. You may want to annotate the trace when the inforbar pops up & verify whether that aligns with the jank that occurs.
,
Feb 13 2017
I think turning the infobar off in this test is the right thing to do, users only see it up to 3 times ever, and only once per day. Do the perf tests run with special flags or something that I could check when deciding whether to show the infobar or not?
,
Feb 13 2017
To #9: we don't have one flag to disable all the features for perf. Instead, we have lots of flag, one for each features we disable (see https://github.com/catapult-project/catapult/blob/master/telemetry/telemetry/internal/backends/chrome/chrome_browser_backend.py#L77). This would allow us to carefully track how Chrome under perf test is different from the CHrome that our users use.
,
Feb 14 2017
Great, thanks for that. I'll add a flag to not show the disclosure and update the tests to use it.
,
Feb 23 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/f714d2c9fc6f4d8309833d3329fc58b8bba4832a commit f714d2c9fc6f4d8309833d3329fc58b8bba4832a Author: benwells <benwells@chromium.org> Date: Thu Feb 23 06:10:26 2017 Early exit from the search geolocation disclosure if it is disabled. There is no need to perform all the checks for showing the disclosure if the new search geolocation consistency feature is disabled. BUG= 681663 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2711063002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#452415} [modify] https://crrev.com/f714d2c9fc6f4d8309833d3329fc58b8bba4832a/chrome/browser/android/search_geolocation/search_geolocation_disclosure_tab_helper.cc
,
Feb 24 2017
I realised my theory was wrong as the infobar only shows if a flag is on, and it is off by default. So I landed a change which should make any impact without the flag minimal, but it still hasn't helped. In the graphs there seem to be two things measured (...+obama and ...+obama_ref_), and the gap between them is what grew. What is the difference between the two things? I'm now wondering if maybe it wasn't my change at all. Looking at the graphs there is a significant widening of the gap between the two lines, but it isn't clear what point the gap widens at (the gap size is noisy).
,
Feb 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986776680064822096
,
Feb 24 2017
The ...+obama is running the benchmark on TOT chrome, the ...+obama_ref_ is running the benchmark on stable Chrome (chrome 55). So what's going on here is TOT chrome were having higher input latency compared with stable Chrome :-( I restarted the bisect to make sure.
,
Feb 24 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author benwells@chromium.org === Hi benwells@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : benwells Commit : b3c6a28850a816162c59526005665c683ca42308 Date : Fri Jan 13 14:13:45 2017 Subject: Show the search geolocation disclosure from geolocation API use. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.top_25_smooth Metric : mean_input_event_latency/https___www.google.com__hl_en_q_barack+obama Change : 20.76% | 7.682 -> 9.27683333333 Revision Result N chromium@443534 7.682 +- 0.545447 6 good chromium@443544 7.656 +- 0.698536 6 good chromium@443549 7.629 +- 0.504716 6 good chromium@443551 7.72933 +- 0.668031 6 good chromium@443552 7.7425 +- 0.409604 6 good chromium@443553 9.27683 +- 0.702929 6 bad <-- To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com..hl.en.q.barack.obama smoothness.top_25_smooth Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8986776680064822096 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5811591930445824 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Feb 27 2017
Hmm ... ok ... What flags does this run with? Is there any chance it could have some finch experiments applied (e.g. ones in testing/variations/fieldtrial_testing_config.json)??
,
Feb 27 2017
Sorry for the confusion, the perfbots DO run with the flags in testing/variations/fieldtrial_testing_config.json
,
Mar 1 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/333a6dee3c08b91580f27ab196288bb7cdb21fdb commit 333a6dee3c08b91580f27ab196288bb7cdb21fdb Author: benwells <benwells@chromium.org> Date: Wed Mar 01 00:44:53 2017 Add switch to disable showing the search geolocation disclosure UI. This UI can impact perf tests, so a switch is being added to allow the impact to be disabled. BUG= 681663 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2718313003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#453777} [modify] https://crrev.com/333a6dee3c08b91580f27ab196288bb7cdb21fdb/chrome/browser/android/search_geolocation/search_geolocation_disclosure_tab_helper.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/333a6dee3c08b91580f27ab196288bb7cdb21fdb/chrome/browser/android/search_geolocation/search_geolocation_disclosure_tab_helper.h [modify] https://crrev.com/333a6dee3c08b91580f27ab196288bb7cdb21fdb/chrome/common/chrome_switches.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/333a6dee3c08b91580f27ab196288bb7cdb21fdb/chrome/common/chrome_switches.h
,
Mar 2 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/4a49718819f42a744f99682a9571006b99258f8a commit 4a49718819f42a744f99682a9571006b99258f8a Author: catapult-deps-roller <catapult-deps-roller@chromium.org> Date: Thu Mar 02 02:01:39 2017 Roll src/third_party/catapult/ bfa19dece..b06826430 (2 commits) https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult.git/+log/bfa19decec4a..b06826430a44 $ git log bfa19dece..b06826430 --date=short --no-merges --format='%ad %ae %s' 2017-03-01 benwells Add argument to chrome perf tests to disable search geo disclosure. 2017-03-01 jessimb Update not available row values to not available. Created with: roll-dep src/third_party/catapult BUG= 681663 Documentation for the AutoRoller is here: https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/master/autoroll/README.md If the roll is causing failures, see: http://www.chromium.org/developers/tree-sheriffs/sheriff-details-chromium#TOC-Failures-due-to-DEPS-rolls CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.android:android_optional_gpu_tests_rel TBR=catapult-sheriff@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2727063003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#454149} [modify] https://crrev.com/4a49718819f42a744f99682a9571006b99258f8a/DEPS
,
Mar 3 2017
I think it's better now, but it's a bit hard to tell.
,
Mar 3 2017
Ben: it seems like TOT chrome is now close to ref build again, which is great. Let wait for a few more days to check the data, then we can close this bug, I think.
,
Mar 8 2017
OK, I'm calling it. Reopen if you disagree... |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Jan 16 2017