All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=681640

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgoPyMywgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win10

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990284121124890352

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.qq.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@443071      31.1535 +- 8.45701      21      good
chromium@443166      33.1206 +- 30.981       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.qq.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990284121124890352

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5793013437038592


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982584497903733664

This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.