Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
24.2% regression in blink_perf.layout at 443167:443197 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990289784003600880
,
Jan 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : keishi Commit : 51ed0d54153a164e68155447fcd1cfcb393f1870 Date : Thu Jan 12 10:04:46 2017 Subject: Add renderer memory metrics Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : Shapes_MultipleShapes/Shapes_MultipleShapes Change : 24.28% | 15.978 -> 19.8581666667 Revision Result N chromium@443167 15.978 +- 0.856392 6 good chromium@443182 15.9033 +- 0.207662 6 good chromium@443190 16.1462 +- 0.589975 6 good chromium@443194 16.0108 +- 0.389282 6 good chromium@443195 20.1368 +- 0.919103 6 bad <-- chromium@443196 20.1537 +- 0.304147 6 bad chromium@443197 19.8582 +- 0.651586 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990289784003600880 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5874792969797632 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Jan 16 2017