Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
78% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 439564:439798 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990289921279279728
,
Jan 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest Revision Result N chromium@439564 20.7257 +- 29.3131 21 good chromium@439798 28.5671 +- 55.4873 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.browsing_desktop Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990289921279279728 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5894530357788672 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 28 2017
Nothing is going to happen here anymore and it actually recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mlippautz@chromium.org
, Jan 16 2017