New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 681619 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

78% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 439564:439798

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@chromium.org, Jan 16 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=681619

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg4KLJrAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_avg/browse_media/browse_media_pinterest

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@439564      20.7257 +- 29.3131      21      good
chromium@439798      28.5671 +- 55.4873      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.pinterest v8.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990289921279279728

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5894530357788672


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Nothing is going to happen here anymore and it actually recovered.

Sign in to add a comment