Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 442774:442831 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990293393631622496
,
Jan 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_games/load_games_lazors Revision Result N chromium@442774 2464824 +- 837.346 21 good chromium@442831 2464858 +- 501.692 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.lazors system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990293393631622496 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5907860862533632 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Jan 16 2017