Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 443251:443443 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990294517304241056
,
Jan 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Revision Result N chromium@443251 7810933 +- 566495 21 good chromium@443443 7780828 +- 365685 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.yandex.ru.touchsearch.text.science memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990294517304241056 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5796089707364352 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 20 2017
,
Jan 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989548017448143328
,
Jan 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Change : 1.64% | 7977063.11111 -> 7834447.11111 Suspected Commit Range 2 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/100c919f8fc51a06aee219a6898424f006cca92a..f5cb683f8e23e164b8ff7049d877fe266d4e8209 Revision Result N chromium@443250 7977063 +- 223042 9 good chromium@443347 7922277 +- 412085 14 good chromium@443395 7977476 +- 224008 9 good chromium@443398 7987120 +- 229759 14 good chromium@443399 8003128 +- 2489.38 6 good chromium@443400 --- --- build failure chromium@443401 7929713 +- 295164 14 bad chromium@443407 7962511 +- 2615.32 6 bad chromium@443419 7849134 +- 275996 6 bad chromium@443443 7834447 +- 330481 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8989548017448143328 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6165654563979264 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982580659763989232
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Jan 16 2017