Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases failing on 9 builders |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionsmoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases failing on 9 builders Type: build-failure Builders failed on: - Win 10 High-DPI Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%2010%20High-DPI%20Perf - Win 10 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%2010%20Perf - Win 7 ATI GPU Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%207%20ATI%20GPU%20Perf - Win 7 Intel GPU Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%207%20Intel%20GPU%20Perf - Win 7 Nvidia GPU Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%207%20Nvidia%20GPU%20Perf - Win 7 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%207%20Perf - Win 7 x64 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%207%20x64%20Perf - Win 8 Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%208%20Perf - Win Zenbook Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Win%20Zenbook%20Perf
,
Jan 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Test failure found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases Metric : frame_time_discrepancy/yuv_decoding.html Revision Exit Code N chromium@442978 1 +- N/A 5 good chromium@443077 1 +- N/A 5 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=yuv.decoding.html smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990629720983004880 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5777137560190976 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990621933743790368
,
Jan 13 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author zakerinasab@chromium.org === Hi zakerinasab@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Test failure found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : zakerinasab Commit : 7fb9535883e50ab0d7262ea8a0e8470934e57a9c Date : Wed Jan 11 19:09:13 2017 Subject: Implement color management for ImageData Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases Metric : mean_frame_time/mean_frame_time Revision Exit Code N chromium@442949 0 +- N/A 20 good chromium@442965 0 +- N/A 20 good chromium@442970 0 +- N/A 20 good chromium@442972 0 +- N/A 20 good chromium@442973 1 +- N/A 20 bad <-- chromium@442974 1 +- N/A 20 bad chromium@442980 1 +- N/A 20 bad chromium@443009 1 +- N/A 20 bad chromium@443069 1 +- N/A 20 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990621933743790368 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5573113862946816 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 13 2017
I created a revert in https://codereview.chromium.org/2636533002/
,
Jan 13 2017
The patch would not revert cleanly. zakerinasab: can you please take a look? This is causing lots of perf waterfall failures on Windows.
,
Jan 13 2017
+pam, amineer: This is another stability-related issue. It's really unclear in the logs what happened: chrome just stops running, but we can't find a callstack. https://luci-logdog.appspot.com/v/?s=chrome%2Fbb%2Fchromium.perf%2FWin_10_High-DPI_Perf%2F189%2F%2B%2Frecipes%2Fsteps%2Fsmoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases_on_Intel_GPU_on_Windows_on_Windows-10-10240%2F0%2Fstdout https://luci-logdog.appspot.com/v/?s=chrome%2Fbb%2Fchromium.perf%2FWin_10_Perf%2F258%2F%2B%2Frecipes%2Fsteps%2Fsmoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases_on__102b__GPU_on_Windows_on_Windows-10-10240%2F0%2Fstdout (In this case we're able to bisect and see that it starts with the CL above, but if this happens flakily we are out of luck)
,
Jan 13 2017
I'm looking into it. If a quick fix was not possible, I'll create a manual revert and land it for now.
,
Jan 13 2017
Thanks! Note that if you're unable to repro, the same hardware/OS configs are available on perf try bots: https://www.chromium.org/developers/telemetry/performance-try-bots
,
Jan 14 2017
,
Jan 19 2017
The issue has been fixed and the respective CL was landed again (https://codereview.chromium.org/2555213002/) at commit position 443939. None of the mentioned perf bots report failing on smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases performance test. So I set the status of this bug as fixed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jan 12 2017