Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 442247:442279 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 12 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990637194056848496
,
Jan 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile_stress Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science Revision Result N chromium@442247 11650748 +- 967911 21 good chromium@442279 11753237 +- 937176 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.en.m.wikipedia.org.wiki.Science memory.top_10_mobile_stress Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990637194056848496 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6433297430740992 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 3 2017
Only nexus9. Wontfix.
,
Mar 14 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benjhayden@chromium.org
, Jan 12 2017