Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1%-1.3% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 441470:441537 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionLinks below.
,
Jan 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990897279816988400
,
Jan 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to continue Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either good or bad. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Revision Result N chromium@441469 21467093 +- 675009 21 good chromium@441497 21560945 +- 574048 21 unknown chromium@441525 21597234 +- 672115 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990897279816988400 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5872255382323200 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10 2017
regression too small, might just be noise. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com
, Jan 10 2017