Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.8%-10.1% regression in dromaeo.domcorequery at 441357:441378 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionLinks below.
,
Jan 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990905906266604192
,
Jan 9 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author mlippautz@chromium.org === Hi mlippautz@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : mlippautz Commit : 3ea9f88ef8b0dcba9d1805293cc32dbfbd678615 Date : Wed Jan 04 14:07:36 2017 Subject: [wrapper-tracing] Simplify tracing and reduce technical debt Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : dromaeo.domcorequery Metric : dom/dom Change : 3.38% | 30285.7879033 -> 29261.0503561 Revision Result N chromium@441356 30285.8 +- 539.185 6 good chromium@441362 30149.5 +- 391.985 6 good chromium@441365 30157.7 +- 359.484 6 good chromium@441366 29543.9 +- 624.712 6 bad <-- chromium@441367 29466.9 +- 687.705 6 bad chromium@441378 29261.1 +- 1406.39 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests dromaeo.domcorequery Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990905906266604192 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776651289362432 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10 2017
,
Jan 18 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/92b8a98af078e38774b2b1b1818fb0d461f5fc13 commit 92b8a98af078e38774b2b1b1818fb0d461f5fc13 Author: mlippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org> Date: Wed Jan 18 15:25:32 2017 [wrapper-tracing] Force inlining of marking deque helper BUG= 679510 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2640033002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#444361} [modify] https://crrev.com/92b8a98af078e38774b2b1b1818fb0d461f5fc13/third_party/WebKit/Source/platform/heap/WrapperVisitor.h
,
Jan 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990107348831547680
,
Jan 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : mlippautz Commit : 3ea9f88ef8b0dcba9d1805293cc32dbfbd678615 Date : Wed Jan 04 14:07:36 2017 Subject: [wrapper-tracing] Simplify tracing and reduce technical debt Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : get-elements-by-tag-name/get-elements-by-tag-name Change : 9.34% | 651.366428875 -> 590.508242728 Revision Result N chromium@441356 651.366 +- 13.0804 6 good chromium@441362 651.323 +- 10.3955 6 good chromium@441365 639.986 +- 34.0784 6 good chromium@441366 578.653 +- 18.6902 6 bad <-- chromium@441367 589.132 +- 15.7779 6 bad chromium@441378 590.508 +- 11.6844 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990107348831547680 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6390804433600512 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 19 2017
This is fixed with #5. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com
, Jan 9 2017