Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-6.2% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 441338:441417 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionLinks below.
,
Jan 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990907886561025536
,
Jan 9 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_google Revision Result N chromium@441403 23319213 +- 2193461 21 good chromium@441406 23584283 +- 2491831 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.google system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990907886561025536 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5901444785373184 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990895567267024624
,
Jan 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990895556752280480
,
Jan 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990895547944456976
,
Jan 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_facebook_photos Revision Result N chromium@441403 21617147 +- 428595 21 good chromium@441417 21666334 +- 577116 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.facebook.photos system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990895567267024624 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5897984920780800 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_sohu Revision Result N chromium@441403 19875149 +- 500426 21 good chromium@441417 19858315 +- 629600 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.sohu system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990895556752280480 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5909196932907008 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_google Revision Result N chromium@441403 23352957 +- 2550659 21 good chromium@441417 23673712 +- 2394831 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.google system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990895547944456976 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5799407905144832 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10 2017
I don't know what's going on with this metric this week, but I'm guessing this is also machine related, or possibly swarming related. It's small and not reproducible by bisect bots. WontFix.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982580449453431024
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_google Revision Result N chromium@441403 23346032 +- 2278261 21 good chromium@441417 23387382 +- 2409294 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.google system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982580449453431024 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5799407905144832 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com
, Jan 9 2017