Eugene, would you be interested in implementing this in the same way you did css grid?

We don't have any plans to work on this in the upcoming year. However, we'd be happy to review any CLs for this!

If you think this is important, please re-file with justification.

Thanks.

If I hadn't thought it is important (meaning: I feel lack of functionality when debugging a layout) I would not have filed the ticket. Archiving that ticket and responding to it as in comment 3, without opening a discussion, is definitely a show of arrogance.

Using abbreviations known for yourselves is one too.

Also, an arrogance is saying that you have no plans for implementing a feature, before you really could understand what this feature request is about. Either you understand it and you don't need further clarification or justification, or you don't - in which case you would not be able to know whether you have plans to implement it or not.


At any rate, Comment 3 marks the end of my input to the project. I do not expect you to weep or make me come back, I just want to let you know that I feel completely let down by the communication.

If you have lot of stuff on your table, do you stuff, do your own planning. Do not pretend you are *open*.

Adios.