New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 679327 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Owner:
Closed: Jan 2017
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

53.1% regression in v8.browsing_mobile at 440660:440664

Project Member Reported by jgruber@chromium.org, Jan 9 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=679327

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg34OxuAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-one

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@440659      4.12161 +- 1.4501       21      good
chromium@440664      4.13675 +- 2.59918      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990941396794189072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4973682725748736


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@440659      4.17695 +- 1.76023      21      good
chromium@440664      4.3622 +- 2.05881       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990932208382625808

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5900159919063040


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 12 2017

Mergedinto: 677457
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : mlippautz
  Commit : fb8b3bcc821cf11c22593d2773c5f06823acd53f
  Date   : Fri Dec 23 12:25:38 2016
  Subject: Reland "[heap] Ensure progress when incrementally marking wrappers"

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube
  Change       : 67.45% | 2.57797268519 -> 4.31678421116

Revision                           Result                   N
chromium@440609                    2.57797 +- 0.690717      6      good
chromium@440633                    2.64374 +- 0.569935      6      good
chromium@440639                    2.57076 +- 0.419907      6      good
chromium@440642                    2.69619 +- 0.650179      6      good
chromium@440642,v8@fb8b3bcc82      4.11507 +- 1.86162       9      bad       <--
chromium@440642,v8@3924df53e8      4.0398 +- 0.730261       6      bad
chromium@440643                    4.18728 +- 0.714769      6      bad
chromium@440644                    4.15563 +- 1.17795       6      bad
chromium@440645                    3.81307 +- 1.29803       9      bad
chromium@440657                    4.1198 +- 0.776071       6      bad
chromium@440704                    4.31678 +- 0.975069      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990672415987181488

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6424918083764224


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 10 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_mobile
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-finalize_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@440659      4.23219 +- 1.72084      21      good
chromium@440664      4.17529 +- 2.30283      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.browsing_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982667437449428080

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4973682725748736


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment