New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 679325 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
jgruber@chromium.org
Closed: Mar 2017
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 675639


Sign in to add a comment

21.8% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 at 441259:441326

Project Member Reported by jgruber@chromium.org, Jan 9 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by jgruber@chromium.org, Jan 9 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=679325

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg_9XOowoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-zenbook
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 9 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@441258      93254876 +- 29688038      21      good
chromium@441326      91010564 +- 25809477      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990942069114350336

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5898241276641280


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 12 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/https___mail.google.com_mail_

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@441258      121880147 +- 66076177      21      good
chromium@441326      115762795 +- 55980379      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...mail.google.com.mail. memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990677858436536752

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5037025708736512


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 12 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/https___mail.google.com_mail_

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@441208      90228963 +- 45614325      21      good
chromium@441376      91598063 +- 43476918      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...mail.google.com.mail. memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990677883639107440

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5839491291414528


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 16 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/https___mail.google.com_mail_

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@441258      117005482 +- 64676445      21      good
chromium@441326      117463429 +- 89581211      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...mail.google.com.mail. memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990299258051413392

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5818349046464512


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 17 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/https___mail.google.com_mail_

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@441208      90100975 +- 44558659      21      good
chromium@441376      89446019 +- 39458775      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...mail.google.com.mail. memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990213043486100768

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833938301353984


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 17 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/https___mail.google.com_mail_

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@441208      114002769 +- 73224051      21      good
chromium@441376      117177387 +- 54677032      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...mail.google.com.mail. memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990213091674353920

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5837196973572096


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 14 by simonhatch@chromium.org, Jan 20 2017

Blockedon: 675639
Blocking on crbug.com/675639 for no memory.* repro
Project Member

Comment 16 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jan 24 2017 

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/678
Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.
Project Member

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Feb 13 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@441258      93122134 +- 38641224      21      good
chromium@441326      93462883 +- 26076096      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8987770335651732192

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5823925105197056


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 19 by jgruber@chromium.org, Mar 21 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Still no successful bisect and graphs are back down, closing.
Project Member

Comment 22 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/https___mail.google.com_mail_

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@441258      123441210 +- 58822237      21      good
chromium@441326      119393806 +- 64629264      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...mail.google.com.mail. memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982655882872428928

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5037025708736512


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
►

Sign in to add a comment