Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Regression: App launcher overlay boarders is seen missing |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionChrome Version: 57.0.2975.0/9164.0.0 dev-channel Quawks, Butterfly OS: Chrome What steps will reproduce the problem? (1)Sign in to user>> launch browser>> click on launcher icon >> and observe Expected: App launcher window boarders should not be seen missed (Refer screenshot) Actual: Instead boarders is seen missing (Refer screenshot) This is a Regression issue as issue not seen in M57: 57.0.2970.0/9154.0.0 dev-channel Quawks Issue is not applicable to Linux and Windows
,
Mar 6 2017
I'm not able to repro on 57.0.2987.75 samus. Can we confirm if this is still happening?
,
Mar 6 2017
sandeepkumars@ can you please respond to comment #2 above? If this doesn't repro please remove the RBS label.
,
Mar 7 2017
abodenha@ does this look stable blocking?
,
Mar 8 2017
Issue is still seen in latest M59: 59.0.3033.0/9347.0.0 dev-channel Paine Note: Please have the browser NTP in the background before launching the APP launcher
,
Mar 8 2017
+abodenha for review. Doesn't look like RBS to me. Please advise.
,
Mar 8 2017
warx@ can you look into this? If we're really losing the dropshadow on the launcher that's really bad. I'm unable to confirm here tho.
,
Mar 8 2017
sandeepkumars@ can you confirm if this is seen on all devices or a particular set of devices? If it is the latter, what devices is that?
,
Mar 8 2017
I can see it on veyron_minnie tot also.
,
Mar 8 2017
If it is a chrome side issue, then we can bisect in 57.0.2970.0 ~ 57.0.2975.0. I am doing it right now. The emulator build does show that 57.0.2970.0 is good, and 57.0.2975.0 is bad. By taking a quick look at the changelists, maybe this CL is related https://codereview.chromium.org/2588103004 +estade for guidance and question: is it the new MD behavior? If so, this bug should be a WontFix.
,
Mar 8 2017
,
Mar 8 2017
you can see it on tot? I can't. It should have been fixed by https://crrev.com/3f8c2b4194ebb61b23c8eec97a24a4074f38f136
,
Mar 8 2017
I should be more specific. I could see #5 effect on tot, but not reporter's actual_launcher.png's effect. In this issue, there are three figures. I think you mean the third png is the one that we want to ship to users, right? Then tot is all right. Then I believe this is a WontFix since #12 CL is landed in 57.0.2977.0. Please test it after 57.0.2977.0. Thanks Evan.
,
Mar 8 2017
assign back for #13 comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by keta...@chromium.org
, Mar 6 2017