New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 678734 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 675639



Sign in to add a comment

1.5%-1.9% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 441307:441329

Project Member Reported by sullivan@chromium.org, Jan 5 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@441306      13775683 +- 429345      21      good
chromium@441329      13808304 +- 401579      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991275686537076352

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5909826947776512


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Blockedon: 675639
Status: Available (was: Untriaged)
Blocked on being able to reliably repro memory regressions on bisect bots.
Status: WontFix (was: Available)
bisect bot could not repro.

Sign in to add a comment