Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5%-1.9% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 441307:441329 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991275686537076352
,
Jan 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Revision Result N chromium@441306 13775683 +- 429345 21 good chromium@441329 13808304 +- 401579 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991275686537076352 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5909826947776512 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 6 2017
Blocked on being able to reliably repro memory regressions on bisect bots.
,
Aug 16 2017
bisect bot could not repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Jan 5 2017