Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
34.1%-36.2% regression in blink_perf.svg at 440753:440775 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991297901726776240
,
Jan 5 2017
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@440752 37.5852 8.06693 30 good chromium@440775 38.2705 9.80017 30 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Bug ID: 678612 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg Test Metric: UnderTheSee/UnderTheSee Relative Change: 1.82% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/639 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991297901726776240 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5232252504506368 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991295060959388800
,
Jan 5 2017
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@440752 31.4028 7.82075 30 good chromium@440775 31.738 11.9178 30 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Bug ID: 678612 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg Test Metric: CrawFishGanson/CrawFishGanson Relative Change: 1.07% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/640 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991295060959388800 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5781991541178368 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651572073340176
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.svg Metric : UnderTheSee/UnderTheSee Revision Result N chromium@440752 48.3666 +- 91.8664 21 good chromium@440775 47.6931 +- 98.5755 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651572073340176 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5232252504506368 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982592460086080816
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Jan 5 2017