Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.3%-33.5% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 440856:440900 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jan 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991301682314645088
,
Jan 5 2017
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@440855 77.6033 141.13 21 good chromium@440900 69.6182 8.95742 21 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 678596 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.ebay.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Test Metric: timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.ebay.com Relative Change: 10.29% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6967 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991301682314645088 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6696625764827136 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991297866220850192
,
Jan 5 2017
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@440855 268.281 31.0195 21 good chromium@440900 268.898 19.738 21 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 678596 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.ebay.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Test Metric: timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.ebay.com Relative Change: 0.23% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6968 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991297866220850192 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5243996018835456 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982640127380248464
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Jan 5 2017