Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
21.3% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 440850:440878 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionPossible culprit https://codereview.chromium.org/2601003002 Firing bisect
,
Jan 4 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991374206785606816
,
Jan 4 2017
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@440849 25050161 29482.5 21 good chromium@440878 25049381 26272.8 21 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 678304 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.search.yahoo.com.search..ylt.p.google memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Relative Change: 0.00% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2862 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991374206785606816 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5867848205860864 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Jan 4 2017