Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2324.3% regression in v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 at 440629:440659 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991947681539295504
,
Dec 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@440628 89.2437 403.198 30 good chromium@440659 101.467 450.245 30 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 677455 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 Test Metric: v8-gc-incremental-step_max/v8-gc-incremental-step_max Relative Change: 13.70% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1901 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991947681539295504 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5815695357509632 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 2 2017
,
Jan 11 2017
this may be due to the changes to GC https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=468240
,
Jan 12 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990641590812777968
,
Jan 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : ulan Commit : da328981ff11d136f484afc0638e919a8c781c62 Date : Thu Dec 22 16:14:09 2016 Subject: [heap] Move GC tracer scope for incremental marking step one level up. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_max/v8-gc-incremental-step_max Change : 908.62% | 4.24122222222 -> 42.7778 Revision Result N chromium@440063 4.24122 +- 0.725444 9 good chromium@440361 4.06297 +- 0.555902 6 good chromium@440436 4.23507 +- 0.338973 6 good chromium@440473 4.16057 +- 0.447449 6 good chromium@440492 4.21427 +- 0.516965 6 good chromium@440494 4.25633 +- 0.797592 6 good chromium@440494,v8@0f12793f69 4.27003 +- 0.431303 6 good chromium@440494,v8@da328981ff 33.9613 +- 62.767 6 bad <-- chromium@440494,v8@f8f09ec50b 35.3241 +- 50.4405 6 bad chromium@440495 50.1894 +- 54.0531 6 bad chromium@440497 54.2815 +- 53.208 6 bad chromium@440501 52.1497 +- 64.9906 6 bad chromium@440510 34.8617 +- 43.9148 6 bad chromium@440659 42.7778 +- 75.8853 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990641590812777968 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6113874807357440 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Dec 29 2016