All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=677399

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg78-G4ggM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg76qlpAkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgr9uyqQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
chromium-rel-win8-dual

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991949693631748576

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@439388  79.3675  3.06054  30  good
chromium@439392  78.954   5.09068  30  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_8_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 677399

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg_slimmingpaintinvalidation
Test Metric: WorldIso/WorldIso
Relative Change: 0.52%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2309
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8991949693631748576


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5892291871375360

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.