New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 677140 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 3
Type: Feature



Sign in to add a comment

Chrome (official, not chromium) does not support armhf or arm64

Reported by halcan...@gmail.com, Dec 27 2016

Issue description

OS Version: Linux raspberrypi 4.4.21-v7+ #911 SMP Thu Sep 15 14:22:38 BST 2016 armv7l GNU/Linux

URLs (if applicable) : https://www.google.com/chrome/browser/desktop/

--

This might not be an important platform today, but there is a good chance that more and more people will brows the web on ARM-Linux in the future.

--

UserAgentString: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/51.0.2704.91 Safari/537.36



 
Components: Infra>Client>Chrome>Release
Labels: -Type-Bug Type-Feature
Status: Untriaged (was: Unconfirmed)
As this issue seems to be feature request , marking this as Untriaged.

Thank you.

Comment 3 by mmoss@chromium.org, Jan 17 2018

Cc: thestig@chromium.org lafo...@chromium.org mmoss@chromium.org amineer@chromium.org
Components: -Infra>Client>Chrome>Release
This isn't really an Infra issue, but a product decision about whether or not those platforms are worth supporting. It doesn't look like we have a Product/Program Management component for these sorts of things, so adding some people who might have thoughts.
Looking at the current data on https://popcon.debian.org/

amd64: 165920
i386: 33100
all ARM variants combined: 1050

https://popcon.ubuntu.com/ also shows low ARM numbers relative to x86.

Comment 5 by laforge@google.com, Jan 18 2018

Cc: rpop@chromium.org
+Rachel for a product decision about desktop support.
Components: Build
Owner: rpop@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

Comment 7 by mmoss@chromium.org, Jan 18 2018

Re: #4, looking at mainstream distro numbers might not give an accurate reflection of actual arm usage, since I suspect a lot of these devices are running things like raspbian or armbian, which probably aren't counted by popcorn. That said, the number of arm users, or even more specifically, the number of people running web browsers on these devices, probably is very very low relative to x86 usage.
Cc: -amineer@chromium.org
No longer on the Chrome team, e-mail me @google.com if any attention still required from me here, otherwise good luck!

Sign in to add a comment