Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
17.2%-24.5% regression in v8.browsing_mobile_ignition at 439557:439589 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 21 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992652603329207104
,
Dec 21 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/1013 Failure reason: the build has failed.
,
Dec 22 2016
,
Dec 23 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992466757230136112
,
Jan 11 2017
There is a 25% (0.6 Mb) regression on code_and_metadata_size_max on browse_news_hackernews benchmark. The code_and_metadata_size_avg also regresses slightly (by about 8%). Also the code_and_metadata_size_max drops every few runs. It is either in the range 3.3 or 2.7. I suspect it could be because of the timing of gc.
,
Mar 13 2017
These benchmarks are now disabled. The graphs are also noisy.
,
Mar 13 2017
Ned - can we delete this benchmark or disable it?
,
Mar 13 2017
The benchmark should be removed in https://codereview.chromium.org/2711143002/ Reassign to mythria@ to land the CL
,
Mar 13 2017
These benchmarks are removed in this cl: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/451657/. I will also update the other cl to avoid confusion. I uploaded another cl, since rietveld couldn't process some of the changes. This change was submitted through gerrit.
,
Mar 13 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982655872859242528 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mythria@chromium.org
, Dec 21 2016