Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
23% regression in smoothness.sync_scroll.key_mobile_sites_smooth at 439313:439333 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionLikely dupe of http://crbug.com/675010 but I'm splitting it out due to the weird jitter in this graph. We'll see what bisect says.
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992809001685232144
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@439312 19.5474 450.273 341 good chromium@439333 20.8074 713.399 523 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675740 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...cuteoverload.com smoothness.sync_scroll.key_mobile_sites_smooth Test Metric: frame_times/http___cuteoverload.com Relative Change: 6.45% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2336 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992809001685232144 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6347558304088064 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 20 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992798712858769008
,
Dec 20 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@439312 18.1436 325.516 338 good chromium@439333 22.7442 731.176 614 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675740 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...cuteoverload.com smoothness.sync_scroll.key_mobile_sites_smooth Test Metric: frame_times/http___cuteoverload.com Relative Change: 25.36% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2337 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992798712858769008 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5837096072249344 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Feb 3 2017
Only failed on N9s. WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Dec 19 2016