Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
30% regression in blink_perf.dom at 438142:438240 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThe ref build is super noisy, so I'm kicking off a bisect to double-check.
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992819664477223552
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@438141 159.359 14.6353 30 good chromium@438166 161.589 83.9051 30 unknown chromium@438191 161.91 103.703 30 bad chromium@438240 158.912 40.3637 30 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675681 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom Test Metric: modify-element-id/modify-element-id Relative Change: 0.28% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/635 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992819664477223552 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5774592486932480 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982596492306358704
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Dec 19 2016