Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 439095:439125 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionNot sure what to make of this graph. Odd spike, then a regression. I'll kick off a couple of bisects.
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992820422429474528
,
Dec 19 2016
=== PERF REGRESSION === === Auto-CCing suspected CL author mlippautz@chromium.org === Hi mlippautz@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [wrapper-tracing] Reland: Turn on flag Author : mlippautz Commit description: BUG= chromium:468240 NOTRY=true Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2579043002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#439124} Commit : 4b81adefe8d80be06d53b33dd0d5979839596456 Date : Fri Dec 16 16:47:01 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@439094 35630486 1216291 6 good chromium@439110 35805440 1287632 6 good chromium@439118 35353440 1150092 6 good chromium@439122 35531361 1268215 6 good chromium@439123 35758964 2310670 6 good chromium@439124 39823986 1857821 6 bad <-- chromium@439125 39726073 2000132 6 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675675 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.cnn system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_cnn Relative Change: 11.49% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2840 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992820422429474528 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5812777430548480 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 21 2016
Thanks, will keep that one on the radar.
,
Jan 2 2017
I fixed a corner case with fb8b3bcc821cf11c22593d2773c5f06823acd53f where we would not be able to keep up with the mutator and mark indefinitely, also increasing the memory footprint. The regression seems to be fully recovered with V8 5.7.345. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Dec 19 2016