Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
24.4% regression in v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 at 424371:424476 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992844783811115984
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@424370 30809205 33549848 30 good chromium@424423 31870185 28225115 30 good chromium@424450 36035843 37489443 30 unknown chromium@424476 37874038 41488138 30 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675591 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 22.93% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/910 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992844783811115984 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5031923653541888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 20 2016
+simonhatch bisect failed but states no clear reason.
,
Dec 20 2016
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982659681031544224
,
Apr 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to continue Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either good or bad. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg Revision Result N chromium@424370 30809205 +- 33549848 30 good chromium@424423 31870185 +- 28225115 30 good chromium@424450 36035843 +- 37489443 30 unknown chromium@424476 37874038 +- 41488138 30 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll-ignition_tbmv2 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982659681031544224 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5031923653541888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
chromium@424450 looks "bad", but maybe the metric is noisy?
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by perezju@google.com
, Dec 19 2016