Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 439249:439304 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857467108999840
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857455770891056
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@439248 4579105 24186908 120 good chromium@439304 4646023 24455711 120 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675553 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 1.46% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2838 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857467108999840 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5822004899348480 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@439248 4587621 24246500 120 good chromium@439304 4668417 24684154 120 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675553 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 1.76% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2839 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857455770891056 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5897514450944000 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 10
Archiving issues older than 2 years with no owner or component. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Dec 19 2016