Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 438898:439335 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857750951405440
,
Dec 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857727200440736
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@438897 19676425 309784021 336 good chromium@439335 19847601 312754948 336 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 675550 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 0.87% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/1004 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857750951405440 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5851894382067712 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed
=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Infra Failure: Step('device_status (3)') returned 1
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.
===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision Mean Std Dev N Good?
chromium@438897 23469243 612286 6 good
chromium@439116 N/A N/A 0 unknown
chromium@439335 25833512 1992722 6 bad
Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 675550
Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/background_media
Relative Change: 10.07%
Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/1005
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992857727200440736
Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5619233386397696
| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
| X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 21 2016
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982611790195855216
,
Jan 10
Downgrading P2s that haven't been modified in more than 6 months, which have no component or owner. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Dec 19 2016