Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 438648:438736 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 16 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993094704649935600
,
Dec 16 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@438647 4.71524 66.1386 240 good chromium@438736 5.27279 63.0452 240 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 674995 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Test Metric: thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame Relative Change: 11.82% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3563 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993094704649935600 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5890164486832128 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Dec 16 2016