Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.6% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.polymer at 437943:437997 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 13 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993361065369706656
,
Dec 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@437942 201.871 628.109 48 good chromium@437997 238.941 714.1 48 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 673848 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.polymer Test Metric: input_event_latency_discrepancy/input_event_latency_discrepancy Relative Change: 18.36% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/987 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993361065369706656 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5908352951910400 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 16 2016
Closing - recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Dec 13 2016