Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases at 437588:437698 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 13 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993380085582542560
,
Dec 13 2016
=== PERF REGRESSION === === Auto-CCing suspected CL author scottchen@chromium.org === Hi scottchen@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : MD Settings: Make links inside disabled checkbox clickable on syncSetup page Author : scottchen Commit description: BUG= 621903 CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.linux:closure_compilation Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2563443005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#437597} Commit : d93ce395d082047e5b0d5d4ef038eeb3106beb22 Date : Fri Dec 09 18:52:11 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@437587 33.2744 2873.85 5267 good chromium@437594 33.2122 2790.81 5231 good chromium@437596 33.1909 2969.97 5271 good chromium@437597 33.3441 2882.02 5243 bad <-- chromium@437598 33.283 2956.09 5262 bad chromium@437601 33.3063 2928.77 5255 bad chromium@437615 33.4078 2902.94 5244 bad chromium@437643 33.3568 2904.89 5251 bad chromium@437698 34.4188 4383.76 5084 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 673753 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times Relative Change: 3.44% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2827 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993380085582542560 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5898744841633792 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 13 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993373235403985312
,
Dec 13 2016
That CL seems unlikely. I kicked a new bisect on the site that regressed most.
,
Dec 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@437447 62.6323 2394.81 1836 good chromium@437755 67.9247 3994.61 1680 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 673753 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...testdrive.archive.azurewebsites.net.performance.chalkboard. smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Test Metric: frame_times/https___testdrive-archive.azurewebsites.net_performance_chalkboard_ Relative Change: 8.45% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2828 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993373235403985312 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5845359740321792 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990022271258242528
,
Jan 19 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author sunnyps@chromium.org === Hi sunnyps@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sunnyps Commit : 1285660590d371fedced6253c43be569c2d054ee Date : Fri Dec 09 21:09:57 2016 Subject: gpu: Thread-safe command buffer state lookup. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Metric : frame_times/frame_times Change : 2.68% | 33.5884455812 -> 34.4875893373 Revision Result N chromium@437587 33.5884 +- 0.408371 6 good chromium@437643 33.5648 +- 0.303951 6 good chromium@437650 33.8581 +- 0.336794 6 good chromium@437651 34.6773 +- 0.31127 6 bad <-- chromium@437652 34.5383 +- 0.438549 6 bad chromium@437654 34.452 +- 0.221043 6 bad chromium@437657 34.4915 +- 0.31545 6 bad chromium@437671 34.6322 +- 0.688222 6 bad chromium@437698 34.4876 +- 0.533434 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990022271258242528 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6026896552230912 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jan 23 2017
,
Apr 17 2017
,
Aug 16 2017
Bisect didn't reproduce very well, and this wasn't followed up on. Not much we can do 8 months after the regression. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Dec 13 2016