Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
101.7%-263.3% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 421630:421784 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue description2.5 months old regression. Let's see if a bisec works.
,
Dec 13 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993407139144077152
,
Dec 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@421695 0.852373 0.393477 21 good chromium@421773 0.918295 0.327338 21 bad Bisect job ran on: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Bug ID: 673653 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.flipboard v8.browsing_desktop Test Metric: v8-gc-incremental-step_avg/browse_news/browse_news_flipboard Relative Change: 7.73% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect/builds/599 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993407139144077152 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5787802078281728 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 13 2016
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982584721792859264 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mlippautz@google.com
, Dec 13 2016