New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 673350 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Jan 10
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

25.5% regression in v8.browsing_desktop_ignition at 433489:433507

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Dec 12 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, Dec 12 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=673350

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgx5js4wgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 12 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@433488  268.376  1088.32  54  good
chromium@433507  259.835  1084.53  54  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 673350

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.browsing_desktop_ignition
Test Metric: v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/v8-gc-incremental-step_sum
Relative Change: 3.18%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6928
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993468786907814544


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870024529543168

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 12 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@433488  428.452  256.601  21  good
chromium@433507  412.906  281.2    21  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 673350

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_desktop_ignition
Test Metric: v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_media/browse_media_imgur
Relative Change: 3.63%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6929
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993459154238481104


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6032364193447936

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Archiving issues older than 2 years with no owner or component.

Sign in to add a comment