New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 673344 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jun 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.4% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 437028:437086

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@google.com, Dec 12 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=673344

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg19S5sAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus7v2
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 12 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N    Good?
chromium@437027  3725952  23035796  120  good
chromium@437086  3721255  23061220  120  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 673344

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg
Relative Change: 0.13%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3549
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993470055700692848


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5213196791578624

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Cc: -mlippautz@google.com mlippautz@chromium.org
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.top_10_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@437027      3725952 +- 23035796      120      good
chromium@437086      3721255 +- 23061220      120      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651819428271776

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5213196791578624


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Giving up on this one.

Sign in to add a comment