Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.6% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 434903:434955 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Dec 12 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993470252233352592
,
Dec 12 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@434902 3548508 22638557 120 good chromium@434955 3553022 22402329 120 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 673342 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg Relative Change: 0.13% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3548 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993470252233352592 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5878177182777344 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 13 2016
,
Dec 20 2016
,
Jan 12 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990681579434404944
,
Jan 12 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : jgruber Commit : 4e7571a5a9bb8563ae93e0aff48c08bead765b14 Date : Tue Nov 29 09:03:18 2016 Subject: [regexp] Migrate @@match to TurboFan Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/background Change : 4.29% | 1883882.8 -> 1964625.33333 Revision Result N chromium@434852 1883883 +- 1011995 60 good chromium@434926 1885680 +- 1010647 60 good chromium@434963 1910315 +- 1016988 60 good chromium@434972 1912148 +- 1002012 60 good chromium@434977 1911918 +- 1000061 60 good chromium@434978 1911143 +- 2038.37 6 good chromium@434978,v8@18eda7024b 1911899 +- 2424.0 6 good chromium@434978,v8@9c0e2a6723 1911777 +- 2936.17 6 good chromium@434978,v8@4e7571a5a9 1956077 +- 1686.91 6 bad <-- chromium@434979 1964344 +- 3068.64 6 bad chromium@434981 1965307 +- 1003074 60 bad chromium@434999 1964625 +- 1012516 60 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8990681579434404944 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4991772322693120 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mlippautz@google.com
, Dec 12 2016