New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 673326 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

16.6% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 437396:437403

Project Member Reported by pmeenan@chromium.org, Dec 12 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=673326

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg59e8nQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus6
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 12 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@437395  19126444  6910766  21  good
chromium@437403  18637167  9244616  21  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 673326

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.mobile.twitter.com.justinbieber.skip.interstitial.true memory.top_10_mobile_stress
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 2.56%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2822
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993472744980143360


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5802766683865088

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Dec 15 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@437190  19371083  5013597  21  good
chromium@437403  19371083  5013597  21  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 673326

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile_stress
Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 0.00%

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2831
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993184281543742816


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5774009243795456

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment