Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.4%-22.2% regression in v8.browsing_mobile_ignition at 435379:435564 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionBisecting
,
Dec 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993826453405289792
,
Dec 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because Bisect cannot identify a culprit: Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@435425 1708937 433480 27 good chromium@435479 1712588 428923 27 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 672523 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.hackernews v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:code_and_metadata_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_hackernews Relative Change: 0.21% Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2811 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993826453405289792 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5874069784756224 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Dec 21 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992648268682620272
,
Dec 21 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2847 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: Bisect aborted early for lack of confidence. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Dec 21 2016
,
Dec 23 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8992466528341659952
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624221050197424
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:code_and_metadata_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_qq Revision Result N chromium@435378 1515528 +- 131280 21 good chromium@435479 1529173 +- 159654 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq v8.browsing_mobile_ignition Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624221050197424 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5294979092578304 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Sep 28 2017
Not actionable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by leszeks@chromium.org
, Dec 8 2016